Full Swing vs. Foresight: Who Really Leads Ball-Flight Tech?

1. Full Swing Owns Radar Accuracy—Plain and Simple

Let’s be frank: the big difference between Full Swing and Foresight is radar. While Foresight leans on camera-based photometric tech, Full Swing relies on Doppler radar—the same tech behind TrackMan, the undisputed gold standard in ball‑flight measurement. Radar doesn’t guess—it tracks the flight, giving you raw, real-world data.

2. KIT Matches TrackMan in Accuracy—For a Fraction of the Cost

Recent independent testing in Carlsbad (just a couple of weeks ago) pitted Full Swing KIT against TrackMan—the benchmark. Spoiler alert: the KIT held its own, delivering nearly identical data at a much lower price. That’s not hype; that’s proper proof.

3. Tour-Level Precision Without the Sticker Shock

The Full Swing KIT gives you pro-grade accuracy—comparable to GCQuad and TrackMan 4—without burning through your mortgage. Carry distances across driver, 6‑iron, and PW were within 1–2 yards of the others. Believe me, dialled data at a sensible cost? Now that’s value.

4. Speedy Setup & Instant Feedback, No Fuss

Unlike Foresight’s camera setups, which can require careful calibration, lighting, and positioning, the KIT is plug‑and‑play. Place it 10 feet behind the ball, turn it on, pick a club—bang, instant feedback. Plus, you get a built‑in OLED display and slow‑mo swing video. Adjustment done. Simplicity wins.

5. Trusted by Tiger (and Golf Monthly, Natch)

When the GOAT himself backs your gear, you’re doing something right. Tiger Woods uses the Full Swing KIT, and Golf Monthly recently named it a standout among the best portable launch monitors. Meanwhile, reviews commend its accuracy, reliability, and sheer fun factor .